Not at all Friedrich !!~ The inquiry was “who made it “,, Not having much time lately did not get around to the explanation you mean !! Just give me time to get back here !! I do still have six horses, a husband not in good health,, and a house to take care of along with all the details like cooking, laundry ect !! I do not think anything I said negated your statements !! It did need a more in depth explanation which I did not have time to type as it was close to bedtime here !!

LouLav,, Yes the cracks and overall condition of this wash bowl and pitcher would greatly reduce any value !! In excellent condition and by a quality maker value at best would be $85. to $125. USD !! With most less than that !!

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=vintage+wash+bowl+and+pitcher+set&_sacat=0&rt=nc&LH_Sold=1&LH_Complete=1

Here are the recent ebay sold items !! And as Friedrich said when you have two stamps on one item and one clearly on top of the other,, you can bet that the producer did not decorate the item !! Many times these un-decorated sets were sold prior to the artwork being added and as such,, the producer TST is not a factor in any value it may have or not !!
I do find the names interesting,,Its possible the Elizabeth Davis? may be the decorator since her name is hand written in gold paint !! The other Wm. Heath,, may be of the UK family of solicitors !! Would be interesting to check !!

[b]@LouLav :[/b] Thank you for coming back to me. Easy English:
“An Item produced by a company and then repainted by a regular person loses all its value in respect of the original producer. In your case the item is also badly cracked.”

En français: Un article produit par une entreprise puis repeint par une personne ordinaire perd toute sa valeur par rapport au producteur d’origine. Dans votre cas, l’article est également gravement fissuré.

@friedrich With the translation, I’m not sure to understand, does this mean that the chamber pot is worth nothing at all? It is worthless because of cracks and a possibility that the painting is redone? Did I understand right ? The chamber pot is worthless ?

[b]@marthahill:[/b] And now we have another person running around claiming to own a TST item, most probably completely ignoring the facts I stated above. How is that helping people? You could at least have repeated that the producer had turned irrelevant the moment hobbyists defaced the item as he now probably thinks that your post nullifies what mine pointed out – after all he commented on your posts but left mine un-commented.

Thank you very much Marthahill, I will see this link right away, it is very appreciated.